http://www.taranfx.com/google-chrome-native-client-code-x86-windows Your gateway to Technology, Redefined. Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:34:42 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9 hourly 1 http://www.taranfx.com/google-chrome-native-client-code-x86-windows/comment-page-1#comment-5451 modd Wed, 07 Oct 2009 05:36:13 +0000 http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?p=2053#comment-5451 your bolg is not correctly displayed in the opera your bolg is not correctly displayed in the opera

]]> http://www.taranfx.com/google-chrome-native-client-code-x86-windows/comment-page-1#comment-5450 keeb Wed, 07 Oct 2009 02:01:35 +0000 http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?p=2053#comment-5450 Yeah... unique like ActiveX Yeah… unique like ActiveX

]]> http://www.taranfx.com/google-chrome-native-client-code-x86-windows/comment-page-1#comment-5442 website Wed, 07 Oct 2009 00:11:51 +0000 http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?p=2053#comment-5442 Man windows users are douchebags. Man windows users are douchebags.

]]> http://www.taranfx.com/google-chrome-native-client-code-x86-windows/comment-page-1#comment-5441 gioymila Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:16:39 +0000 http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?p=2053#comment-5441 Microsoft allows to embed ActiveX components in Internet Explorer and frankly received over the years a lot of complaints (or worse) for security reasons.<br>What is the difference between Google's NaCl and Microsoft's ActiveX components running inside ie?<br>Why should Google's NaCl be safer? Microsoft allows to embed ActiveX components in Internet Explorer and frankly received over the years a lot of complaints (or worse) for security reasons.
What is the difference between Google's NaCl and Microsoft's ActiveX components running inside ie?
Why should Google's NaCl be safer?

]]>