<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Taranfx: Technology Blog &#187; Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taranfx.com/tag/search/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taranfx.com</link>
	<description>Your gateway to Technology, Redefined.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:04:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://www.taranfx.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Google Your Home with Roomba Bot</title>
		<link>http://www.taranfx.com/google-bot-home</link>
		<comments>http://www.taranfx.com/google-bot-home#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 13:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taranfx</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DIY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gizmos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taranfx.com/google-bot-home</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.taranfx.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/google-bot-home.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-4206" title="google-bot-home" src="http://www.taranfx.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/google-bot-home.jpg" alt="Index your home with Google Gaagle" width="240" height="200" /></a>Google does pretty good job at crawling the web, <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/google-real-time-search-index">fast enough to accommodate Billions of webpages</a>, everyday. For the offline PC searches, Google Desktop finds every needle in the haystack.
But what about your Home? Ever wished that you could index your home and find stuff you misplaced within seconds?
The unofficial project called &#8220;Google Bot&#8221; or &#8220;<em><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.gaaglebot.com/index.html" target="_blank">Gåågle Bot</a>&#8220;</em> to the rescue. The Swedish author claims that <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/google-bot-home' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.taranfx.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/google-bot-home.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-4206" title="google-bot-home" src="http://www.taranfx.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/google-bot-home.jpg" alt="Index your home with Google Gaagle" width="240" height="200" /></a>Google does pretty good job at crawling the web, <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/google-real-time-search-index">fast enough to accommodate Billions of webpages</a>, everyday. For the offline PC searches, Google Desktop finds every needle in the haystack.
But what about your Home? Ever wished that you could index your home and find stuff you misplaced within seconds?
The unofficial project called &#8220;Google Bot&#8221; or &#8220;<em><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.gaaglebot.com/index.html" target="_blank">Gåågle Bot</a>&#8220;</em> to the rescue. The Swedish author claims that <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/google-bot-home' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taranfx.com/google-bot-home/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google to get Real-Time Search Index</title>
		<link>http://www.taranfx.com/google-real-time-search-index</link>
		<comments>http://www.taranfx.com/google-real-time-search-index#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 17:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taranfx</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[realtime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taranfx.com/google-real-time-search-index</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.taranfx.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/google.jpg"><img class="alignleft" title="google" src="http://www.taranfx.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/google_thumb.jpg" border="0" alt="google" width="240" height="116" /></a> Google crawl&#8217;s billions of webpages everyday which includes re-crawling existing pages for changes, and New pages as they appear on the web.
For Popular sites, it takes couples of seconds to minutes to get indexed and listed. For most thing, even new posts on <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/" target="_blank">Taranfx</a> get indexed in under 5 minutes. But sometimes it&#8217;s tough for Google to index and reach-out relatively new sites and pages.
To start with, Google started indexing and displaying <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/google-realtime-search-live">realtime content from Networks like Twitter</a>, <a <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/google-real-time-search-index' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.taranfx.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/google.jpg"><img class="alignleft" title="google" src="http://www.taranfx.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/google_thumb.jpg" border="0" alt="google" width="240" height="116" /></a> Google crawl&#8217;s billions of webpages everyday which includes re-crawling existing pages for changes, and New pages as they appear on the web.
For Popular sites, it takes couples of seconds to minutes to get indexed and listed. For most thing, even new posts on <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/" target="_blank">Taranfx</a> get indexed in under 5 minutes. But sometimes it&#8217;s tough for Google to index and reach-out relatively new sites and pages.
To start with, Google started indexing and displaying <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/google-realtime-search-live">realtime content from Networks like Twitter</a>, <a <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/google-real-time-search-index' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taranfx.com/google-real-time-search-index/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Goggles Visual Search</title>
		<link>http://www.taranfx.com/google-goggles</link>
		<comments>http://www.taranfx.com/google-goggles#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 20:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taranfx</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google goggles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taranfx.com/blog/google-goggles</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" title="Google Googles" src="http://www.googlelabs.com/show_app_thumbnail?app_key=agtnbGFiczIwLXd3d3IUCxIMTGFic0FwcE1vZGVsGPqXLQw" alt="" width="72" height="72" />Today at Google&#8217;s Search event, Google has launched a new application for Google Android mobile phones that will allow people to search for more information about a famous landmark or work of art simply by taking a photo of that object. The announcement came along with <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/google-realtime-search-live">Google Real Time Live search</a>.
Google Goggles can recognise books, tourist attractions, famous paintings and even company logos. Focus your phone&#8217;s camera on an object, and Google compares elements of that picture against its database of images and will point you to the relevant results.
<img class="aligncenter" title="Google Goggles" <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/google-goggles' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" title="Google Googles" src="http://www.googlelabs.com/show_app_thumbnail?app_key=agtnbGFiczIwLXd3d3IUCxIMTGFic0FwcE1vZGVsGPqXLQw" alt="" width="72" height="72" />Today at Google&#8217;s Search event, Google has launched a new application for Google Android mobile phones that will allow people to search for more information about a famous landmark or work of art simply by taking a photo of that object. The announcement came along with <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/google-realtime-search-live">Google Real Time Live search</a>.
Google Goggles can recognise books, tourist attractions, famous paintings and even company logos. Focus your phone&#8217;s camera on an object, and Google compares elements of that picture against its database of images and will point you to the relevant results.
<img class="aligncenter" title="Google Goggles" <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/google-goggles' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taranfx.com/google-goggles/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google RealTime Search LIVE!</title>
		<link>http://www.taranfx.com/google-realtime-search-live</link>
		<comments>http://www.taranfx.com/google-realtime-search-live#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 19:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taranfx</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taranfx.com/blog/google-realtime-search-live</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" title="Google Twitter" src="http://images.pcworld.com/news/graphics/162558-GoogleTwitter_350.jpg" alt="" width="245" height="173" />Google had been taking RealTime search seriously, lately. Months back they <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/bing-ditches-google-now-ready-for-realtime-twitter-search">talked about integration with twitter</a>, and here it comes.
BREAKING!!! <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/tag/google">Google </a>has just launched  real-time search, integrated into it&#8217;s all <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/tag/search">search </a>results pages.
Google real-time search takes all the latest happenings from Live <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/tag/twitter">tweets</a>, <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/tag/yahoo">Yahoo</a> Answers, News  articles and Web pages. Good part: It works  on mobiles (including <a <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/google-realtime-search-live' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" title="Google Twitter" src="http://images.pcworld.com/news/graphics/162558-GoogleTwitter_350.jpg" alt="" width="245" height="173" />Google had been taking RealTime search seriously, lately. Months back they <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/bing-ditches-google-now-ready-for-realtime-twitter-search">talked about integration with twitter</a>, and here it comes.
BREAKING!!! <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/tag/google">Google </a>has just launched  real-time search, integrated into it&#8217;s all <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/tag/search">search </a>results pages.
Google real-time search takes all the latest happenings from Live <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/tag/twitter">tweets</a>, <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/tag/yahoo">Yahoo</a> Answers, News  articles and Web pages. Good part: It works  on mobiles (including <a <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/google-realtime-search-live' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taranfx.com/google-realtime-search-live/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Try New Google Search [Caffeine]</title>
		<link>http://www.taranfx.com/try-new-google-search-caffeine</link>
		<comments>http://www.taranfx.com/try-new-google-search-caffeine#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taranfx</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taranfx.com/blog/try-new-google-search-caffeine</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter" title="Google caffeine" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2720/4133688775_44f12407f0_o.png" alt="" width="422" height="272" />As we reported earlier, <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/googles-new-design-with-caffeine">Google had been working on a new Search (codenamed caffeine)</a> which will bring ground up changes in <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/tag/google">Google</a>&#8217;s searching mechanism, making it faster and efficient without impacting the results. We had discussed <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/googles-new-design-with-caffeine">the revamped UI  in detail</a>.
With a slight hack, you can get to try it before it officially reaches you:
1. Navigate to  Google.com. ( Use http://Google.com/ncr if you are outside U.S.)
2. Copy and paste following javascript into your URL address  <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/try-new-google-search-caffeine' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter" title="Google caffeine" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2720/4133688775_44f12407f0_o.png" alt="" width="422" height="272" />As we reported earlier, <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/googles-new-design-with-caffeine">Google had been working on a new Search (codenamed caffeine)</a> which will bring ground up changes in <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/tag/google">Google</a>&#8217;s searching mechanism, making it faster and efficient without impacting the results. We had discussed <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/googles-new-design-with-caffeine">the revamped UI  in detail</a>.
With a slight hack, you can get to try it before it officially reaches you:
1. Navigate to  Google.com. ( Use http://Google.com/ncr if you are outside U.S.)
2. Copy and paste following javascript into your URL address  <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/try-new-google-search-caffeine' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taranfx.com/try-new-google-search-caffeine/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft to Pay for De-Indexing from Google</title>
		<link>http://www.taranfx.com/microsoft-to-pay-for-de-indexing-from-google</link>
		<comments>http://www.taranfx.com/microsoft-to-pay-for-de-indexing-from-google#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taranfx</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taranfx.com/blog/microsoft-to-pay-for-de-indexing-from-google</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" title="Google Money" src="http://www.eustondigital.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Google-money.JPG" alt="" width="247" height="185" />Microsoft had been having a tough time tackling  Google&#8217;s leadership in Search. In the past they have given out several offers, UI changes to attract users.
Well, the battle just got a whole  lot dirtier, as The Financial Times has uncovered news that Microsoft  has approached several news content providers, <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/a243c8b2-d79b-11de-b578-00144feabdc0.html?nclick_check=1">offering  them money if they opt to &#8220;de-index&#8221; their sites from Google</a>.
It all started with News content providers having a dispute with Google.  News Corp. chairman Rupert Murdoch has threatened with legal action to prevent Google from &#8220;stealing&#8221;  articles published in his newspapers.
<a <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/microsoft-to-pay-for-de-indexing-from-google' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" title="Google Money" src="http://www.eustondigital.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Google-money.JPG" alt="" width="247" height="185" />Microsoft had been having a tough time tackling  Google&#8217;s leadership in Search. In the past they have given out several offers, UI changes to attract users.
Well, the battle just got a whole  lot dirtier, as The Financial Times has uncovered news that Microsoft  has approached several news content providers, <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/a243c8b2-d79b-11de-b578-00144feabdc0.html?nclick_check=1">offering  them money if they opt to &#8220;de-index&#8221; their sites from Google</a>.
It all started with News content providers having a dispute with Google.  News Corp. chairman Rupert Murdoch has threatened with legal action to prevent Google from &#8220;stealing&#8221;  articles published in his newspapers.
<a <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/microsoft-to-pay-for-de-indexing-from-google' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taranfx.com/microsoft-to-pay-for-de-indexing-from-google/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google`s New Design with Caffeine</title>
		<link>http://www.taranfx.com/googles-new-design-with-caffeine</link>
		<comments>http://www.taranfx.com/googles-new-design-with-caffeine#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taranfx</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ui]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taranfx.com/blog/googles-new-design-with-caffeine</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/googles-11th-birthday-journey-from-a-dream-to-cult-of-internet" target="_blank"><img class="alignleft" src="http://www.splicelicio.us/image/google-favicon-icon-andre-resende-computer-science-undergraduate-student-university-of-campinas-brazi-lower-case-g-brand-colors-blue-red-yellow-green-url-web-graphic-design-image.jpg" alt="" width="110" height="110" />Google is now eleven and a half years old</a>, but it has never changed it&#8217;s look drastically. For Google what matter s the most is simplicity. Keeping the simplicity still simple, google is all set to to revamp it&#8217;s <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/tag/search" target="_blank">search</a> <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/tag/ui" target="_blank">UI</a>.
The new look and <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/new-google-search-caffeine" target="_blank">New underlying Search <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/googles-new-design-with-caffeine' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/googles-11th-birthday-journey-from-a-dream-to-cult-of-internet" target="_blank"><img class="alignleft" src="http://www.splicelicio.us/image/google-favicon-icon-andre-resende-computer-science-undergraduate-student-university-of-campinas-brazi-lower-case-g-brand-colors-blue-red-yellow-green-url-web-graphic-design-image.jpg" alt="" width="110" height="110" />Google is now eleven and a half years old</a>, but it has never changed it&#8217;s look drastically. For Google what matter s the most is simplicity. Keeping the simplicity still simple, google is all set to to revamp it&#8217;s <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/tag/search" target="_blank">search</a> <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/tag/ui" target="_blank">UI</a>.
The new look and <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/new-google-search-caffeine" target="_blank">New underlying Search <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/googles-new-design-with-caffeine' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taranfx.com/googles-new-design-with-caffeine/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google to Rank Faster Webpages Higher</title>
		<link>http://www.taranfx.com/google-to-rank-faster-webpages-higher</link>
		<comments>http://www.taranfx.com/google-to-rank-faster-webpages-higher#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 18:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taranfx</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taranfx.com/blog/google-to-rank-faster-webpages-higher</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" title="speed" src="http://computercoders.co.uk/images/search-rankings-rocket.jpg" alt="" width="166" height="166" />With the speed Google is making other products/technologies obsolete, it&#8217;s very fair to quote they are <em>driving the Internet</em>. Speed is something that envy&#8217;s Google the most.
Last week&#8217;s launch of <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/google-spdy-protocol-to-speed-up-the-internet" target="_blank">SPDY: Speedy Protocol for Internet</a>, sure came with a message. It has come out that Google is seriously considering <a href="http://searchengineland.com/site-speed-googles-next-ranking-factor-29793" target="_blank">using page loading time as a factor when returning search results</a>. This isn&#8217;t some unsubstantiated rumor, either; it comes from none other than Matt Cutts, the high-profile Google employee who works on <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/google-to-rank-faster-webpages-higher' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" title="speed" src="http://computercoders.co.uk/images/search-rankings-rocket.jpg" alt="" width="166" height="166" />With the speed Google is making other products/technologies obsolete, it&#8217;s very fair to quote they are <em>driving the Internet</em>. Speed is something that envy&#8217;s Google the most.
Last week&#8217;s launch of <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/google-spdy-protocol-to-speed-up-the-internet" target="_blank">SPDY: Speedy Protocol for Internet</a>, sure came with a message. It has come out that Google is seriously considering <a href="http://searchengineland.com/site-speed-googles-next-ranking-factor-29793" target="_blank">using page loading time as a factor when returning search results</a>. This isn&#8217;t some unsubstantiated rumor, either; it comes from none other than Matt Cutts, the high-profile Google employee who works on <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/google-to-rank-faster-webpages-higher' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taranfx.com/google-to-rank-faster-webpages-higher/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Google Search: Caffeine</title>
		<link>http://www.taranfx.com/new-google-search-caffeine</link>
		<comments>http://www.taranfx.com/new-google-search-caffeine#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taranfx</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taranfx.com/blog/new-google-search-caffeine</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter" title="Google caffeine" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/11/500x_google_caffeine.jpg" alt="" width="340" height="122" /> Google has continued to improve search relevancy by improving quality to it&#8217;s users. The endeavour continues with it&#8217;s new Search engine &#8220;Caffeine&#8221;. As one may expect, it brings no <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/tag/ui" target="_blank">UI</a> updates but brings some unique and useful features to improve overall quality of results.
Back in August when they previewed the new search on a sandbox, we got handson and detailed out the new features.
<a title="Permanent Link to What’s New in Google Caffeine Search" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/whats-new-in-googles-next-generation-search-caffeine-answer-to-bing">What’s New in Google Caffeine Search</a>
Here&#8217;s the text of <a <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/new-google-search-caffeine' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter" title="Google caffeine" src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/11/500x_google_caffeine.jpg" alt="" width="340" height="122" /> Google has continued to improve search relevancy by improving quality to it&#8217;s users. The endeavour continues with it&#8217;s new Search engine &#8220;Caffeine&#8221;. As one may expect, it brings no <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/tag/ui" target="_blank">UI</a> updates but brings some unique and useful features to improve overall quality of results.
Back in August when they previewed the new search on a sandbox, we got handson and detailed out the new features.
<a title="Permanent Link to What’s New in Google Caffeine Search" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/whats-new-in-googles-next-generation-search-caffeine-answer-to-bing">What’s New in Google Caffeine Search</a>
Here&#8217;s the text of <a <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/new-google-search-caffeine' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taranfx.com/new-google-search-caffeine/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bing, Google Search go RealTime with Twitter</title>
		<link>http://www.taranfx.com/bing-google-search-go-realtime-with-twitter</link>
		<comments>http://www.taranfx.com/bing-google-search-go-realtime-with-twitter#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taranfx</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taranfx.com/blog/bing-google-search-go-realtime-with-twitter</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" title="Bing Google Twitter" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2773/4034561186_583a4b2323_o.jpg" alt="" width="210" height="148" />We had been shouting in the dark that <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/google-is-too-slow-and-alternative-is-not-bing" target="_blank">Google and Bing Search are too slow</a>. Seems like Both search leaders have woken-up to it and they are going RealTime with Twitter.
Microsoft <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/bing-ditches-google-now-ready-for-realtime-twitter-search" target="_blank">announced back in June</a> that it will add live updates from micro-blogging service Twitter to its search engine: Bing. However, it is now ready for going live, details described <a href="http://www.bing.com/community/blogs/search/archive/2009/10/21/bing-is-bringing-twitter-search-to-you.aspx" target="_blank">here</a>. Following that, Google <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/bing-google-search-go-realtime-with-twitter' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" title="Bing Google Twitter" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2773/4034561186_583a4b2323_o.jpg" alt="" width="210" height="148" />We had been shouting in the dark that <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/google-is-too-slow-and-alternative-is-not-bing" target="_blank">Google and Bing Search are too slow</a>. Seems like Both search leaders have woken-up to it and they are going RealTime with Twitter.
Microsoft <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/bing-ditches-google-now-ready-for-realtime-twitter-search" target="_blank">announced back in June</a> that it will add live updates from micro-blogging service Twitter to its search engine: Bing. However, it is now ready for going live, details described <a href="http://www.bing.com/community/blogs/search/archive/2009/10/21/bing-is-bringing-twitter-search-to-you.aspx" target="_blank">here</a>. Following that, Google <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/bing-google-search-go-realtime-with-twitter' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taranfx.com/bing-google-search-go-realtime-with-twitter/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vista, Bing, IE Lose Market Share; Windows 7, Google Makes Gains</title>
		<link>http://www.taranfx.com/vista-bing-ie-lose-market-share-windows-7-google-makes-gains</link>
		<comments>http://www.taranfx.com/vista-bing-ie-lose-market-share-windows-7-google-makes-gains#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 18:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taranfx</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?p=2049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter" title="Trend shift windows 7 Windows vista IE firefox bing google search, google chrome, firefox browsers" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2624/3981046386_c0c60d33dc.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="229" />Well, September had been a trend-shifter in most of the things in Technology during which most users looked-out of their &#8220;traditional approach&#8221; to technology, towards the next step in Future.
Last week, we reported that <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/google-kicks-bing-recovers-search-share-80-percent" target="_blank">Google search re-gained it&#8217;s search market share</a>, when it re-gained 80% of the market in U.S, highest since last year.
On the <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/tag/os" target="_blank">Operating system</a> side, Users are running away from Windows Vista to grab Windows 7 copies thereby declaring what was <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/vista-bing-ie-lose-market-share-windows-7-google-makes-gains' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter" title="Trend shift windows 7 Windows vista IE firefox bing google search, google chrome, firefox browsers" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2624/3981046386_c0c60d33dc.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="229" />Well, September had been a trend-shifter in most of the things in Technology during which most users looked-out of their &#8220;traditional approach&#8221; to technology, towards the next step in Future.
Last week, we reported that <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/google-kicks-bing-recovers-search-share-80-percent" target="_blank">Google search re-gained it&#8217;s search market share</a>, when it re-gained 80% of the market in U.S, highest since last year.
On the <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/tag/os" target="_blank">Operating system</a> side, Users are running away from Windows Vista to grab Windows 7 copies thereby declaring what was <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/vista-bing-ie-lose-market-share-windows-7-google-makes-gains' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taranfx.com/vista-bing-ie-lose-market-share-windows-7-google-makes-gains/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google kicks Bing, Recovers search Share: 80 percent</title>
		<link>http://www.taranfx.com/google-kicks-bing-recovers-search-share-80-percent</link>
		<comments>http://www.taranfx.com/google-kicks-bing-recovers-search-share-80-percent#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 21:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taranfx</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?p=2035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>
<strong><img class="alignleft" src="http://www.pamil-visions.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/bing-google.png" alt="" width="220" height="220" />The Redmond giant over-hyped <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/tag/search" target="_blank">search engine</a></strong><strong>, Bing, had a bad adoption during the last month (September), leading to give Google a sky-high search share of 80%, second-highest since last November share of 81.14%</strong>
For the last two months, as Microsoft conveys, Bing had a  gradual ascend in usage share against Google, was a sign of Bing&#8217;s inevitably catching up. Looking at the Spetember&#8217;s numbers, shall we do a similar interpretation of September&#8217;s numbers  as a sign of Bing&#8217;s ultimate demise, taken from live analytics firm StatCounter. <a href="http://gs.statcounter.com/#search_engine-US-monthly-200807-200910" <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/google-kicks-bing-recovers-search-share-80-percent' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
<strong><img class="alignleft" src="http://www.pamil-visions.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/bing-google.png" alt="" width="220" height="220" />The Redmond giant over-hyped <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/tag/search" target="_blank">search engine</a></strong><strong>, Bing, had a bad adoption during the last month (September), leading to give Google a sky-high search share of 80%, second-highest since last November share of 81.14%</strong>
For the last two months, as Microsoft conveys, Bing had a  gradual ascend in usage share against Google, was a sign of Bing&#8217;s inevitably catching up. Looking at the Spetember&#8217;s numbers, shall we do a similar interpretation of September&#8217;s numbers  as a sign of Bing&#8217;s ultimate demise, taken from live analytics firm StatCounter. <a href="http://gs.statcounter.com/#search_engine-US-monthly-200807-200910" <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/google-kicks-bing-recovers-search-share-80-percent' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taranfx.com/google-kicks-bing-recovers-search-share-80-percent/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Search Replaces Bing on Yahoo UK</title>
		<link>http://www.taranfx.com/google-search-replaces-bing-on-yahoo-uk</link>
		<comments>http://www.taranfx.com/google-search-replaces-bing-on-yahoo-uk#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 18:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taranfx</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?p=1773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This could be one of those things that <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?tag=microsoft" target="_blank">Microsoft </a>least expected, and <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?tag=google" target="_blank">Google </a>waited for weeks.
<img class="alignleft" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_O2-XmeoWbrU/SB00R9pRoiI/AAAAAAAACqo/FnhIds8l86c/s320/abc_microsoft_yahoo_google_080217_mn.jpg" alt="" width="224" height="168" />When <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?p=1490" target="_blank">Microsoft made its deal last month</a> with Yahoo to provide the search infrastructure for its home page, using technology from Bing, it left open and non-exclusive the fate of several deals the one-time #2 search provider had already made, especially with carriers. Specifically, does Bing become the default search provider for services that had previously made a deal with Yahoo? The answer appeared to be <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/google-search-replaces-bing-on-yahoo-uk' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This could be one of those things that <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?tag=microsoft" target="_blank">Microsoft </a>least expected, and <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?tag=google" target="_blank">Google </a>waited for weeks.
<img class="alignleft" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_O2-XmeoWbrU/SB00R9pRoiI/AAAAAAAACqo/FnhIds8l86c/s320/abc_microsoft_yahoo_google_080217_mn.jpg" alt="" width="224" height="168" />When <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?p=1490" target="_blank">Microsoft made its deal last month</a> with Yahoo to provide the search infrastructure for its home page, using technology from Bing, it left open and non-exclusive the fate of several deals the one-time #2 search provider had already made, especially with carriers. Specifically, does Bing become the default search provider for services that had previously made a deal with Yahoo? The answer appeared to be <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/google-search-replaces-bing-on-yahoo-uk' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taranfx.com/google-search-replaces-bing-on-yahoo-uk/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Holds &#8220;Screw Google&#8221; Meetings, Screwing Themselves</title>
		<link>http://www.taranfx.com/microsoft-holds-screw-google-meetings-screwing-themselves</link>
		<comments>http://www.taranfx.com/microsoft-holds-screw-google-meetings-screwing-themselves#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 19:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taranfx</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?p=1769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><strong><img class="alignleft" src="http://blog.taragana.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/microsoft-vs-google1.jpg" alt="" width="214" height="128" />How far can one company go just to beat it&#8217;s (stronger) competitor? Hold Weekly meetings?</strong>
It turns out Microsoft has been holding weekly “<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/08/28/microsofts-secret-screw-google-meetings-in-d-c/" target="_blank">Screw Google</a>” meetings, trying to figure out how to throw roadblocks in front of Google as they continue to dominate the search arena. It’s easy for me to say, but doesn’t it anymake a lot more sense to spend millions of dollars making something that’s actually better than Google rather than simply trying to make them look bad? Why?
The Fact &#8211; <a title="Microsoft Secretly Fears Google even after Bing" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?p=1419" <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/microsoft-holds-screw-google-meetings-screwing-themselves' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><img class="alignleft" src="http://blog.taragana.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/microsoft-vs-google1.jpg" alt="" width="214" height="128" />How far can one company go just to beat it&#8217;s (stronger) competitor? Hold Weekly meetings?</strong>
It turns out Microsoft has been holding weekly “<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/08/28/microsofts-secret-screw-google-meetings-in-d-c/" target="_blank">Screw Google</a>” meetings, trying to figure out how to throw roadblocks in front of Google as they continue to dominate the search arena. It’s easy for me to say, but doesn’t it anymake a lot more sense to spend millions of dollars making something that’s actually better than Google rather than simply trying to make them look bad? Why?
The Fact &#8211; <a title="Microsoft Secretly Fears Google even after Bing" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?p=1419" <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/microsoft-holds-screw-google-meetings-screwing-themselves' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taranfx.com/microsoft-holds-screw-google-meetings-screwing-themselves/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yahoo! says it will Continue to Innovate Search</title>
		<link>http://www.taranfx.com/yahoo-says-it-will-continue-to-innovate-search</link>
		<comments>http://www.taranfx.com/yahoo-says-it-will-continue-to-innovate-search#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 18:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taranfx</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?p=1727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://www.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~flgssvc/yahoo-logo_2.gif" alt="" width="200" height="30" />In a conference yesterday,  representatives from Yahoo gave a live demonstration to reporters and  analysts of new features of their principal Web applications that they  believe will attract new users. Included on their list were ways that  Yahoo plans to improve search.
We were surprised when Bartz, Yahoo&#8217;s CEO said <a style="color: #003399; text-decoration: none;" title="Yahoo! CEO Bartz “We Have Never Been a Search Company”. Wrong!" href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?p=1560" target="_blank"> “We Have Never Been a Search Company”</a>. But ray of hope of Innovation at Yahoo! looks to be alive.
After <a title="Microsoft and Yahoo search deal: Here's what you need to know" href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?p=1490" target="_blank">Yahoo  signed away <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/yahoo-says-it-will-continue-to-innovate-search' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://www.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~flgssvc/yahoo-logo_2.gif" alt="" width="200" height="30" />In a conference yesterday,  representatives from Yahoo gave a live demonstration to reporters and  analysts of new features of their principal Web applications that they  believe will attract new users. Included on their list were ways that  Yahoo plans to improve search.
We were surprised when Bartz, Yahoo&#8217;s CEO said <a style="color: #003399; text-decoration: none;" title="Yahoo! CEO Bartz “We Have Never Been a Search Company”. Wrong!" href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?p=1560" target="_blank"> “We Have Never Been a Search Company”</a>. But ray of hope of Innovation at Yahoo! looks to be alive.
After <a title="Microsoft and Yahoo search deal: Here's what you need to know" href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?p=1490" target="_blank">Yahoo  signed away <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/yahoo-says-it-will-continue-to-innovate-search' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taranfx.com/yahoo-says-it-will-continue-to-innovate-search/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Tops Search Customer Satisfaction, AOL improves</title>
		<link>http://www.taranfx.com/google-tops-search-customer-satisfaction-aol-improves</link>
		<comments>http://www.taranfx.com/google-tops-search-customer-satisfaction-aol-improves#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taranfx</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?p=1670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://cruitertalk.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/google_search_2.jpg" alt="" width="216" height="141" />Microsoft and Yahoo sure are in BINGing tunes, they ain&#8217;t considered in these satisfaction levels.
A new report on consumer satisfaction with search engines and Internet portals says we like them more they now than this time last year. Of the major engines, only last-place AOL improved its score. The big winner? &#8220;All others.&#8221;
The <a onclick="popup(this.href,770,600);return false;" href="http://www.idg.com/www/rd.nsf/rd?readform&amp;u=http://www.theacsi.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=197&amp;Itemid=206" target="_blank">American Consumer Satisfaction Index</a> compares customer satisfaction among and across a number of companies and e-business and other sectors. It was released yesterday.
In the quarterly rankings, <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/google-tops-search-customer-satisfaction-aol-improves' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://cruitertalk.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/google_search_2.jpg" alt="" width="216" height="141" />Microsoft and Yahoo sure are in BINGing tunes, they ain&#8217;t considered in these satisfaction levels.
A new report on consumer satisfaction with search engines and Internet portals says we like them more they now than this time last year. Of the major engines, only last-place AOL improved its score. The big winner? &#8220;All others.&#8221;
The <a onclick="popup(this.href,770,600);return false;" href="http://www.idg.com/www/rd.nsf/rd?readform&amp;u=http://www.theacsi.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=197&amp;Itemid=206" target="_blank">American Consumer Satisfaction Index</a> compares customer satisfaction among and across a number of companies and e-business and other sectors. It was released yesterday.
In the quarterly rankings, <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/google-tops-search-customer-satisfaction-aol-improves' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taranfx.com/google-tops-search-customer-satisfaction-aol-improves/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s New in Google Caffeine Search</title>
		<link>http://www.taranfx.com/whats-new-in-googles-next-generation-search-caffeine-answer-to-bing</link>
		<comments>http://www.taranfx.com/whats-new-in-googles-next-generation-search-caffeine-answer-to-bing#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taranfx</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[next generation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?p=1587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://cruitertalk.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/google_search_2.jpg" alt="" width="216" height="141" />No matter what Bing may come and ago, we still love google for it&#8217;s higher relevance and accuracy rather than fancy stuff Microsoft is putting into their <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?p=1016" target="_blank">pathetic-decision engine</a>. Yesterday, without explaining what&#8217;s new, Google opened the floodgates on what it&#8217;s describing as the next generation of its search engine, most likely to test its efficiency and performance using real-world traffic.
Testers have been invited to <a href="http://www2.sandbox.google.com/" target="_blank">sample the new engine</a> that Google calls &#8220;<a href="http://www2.sandbox.google.com/" target="_blank">Caffeine</a>,&#8221;.
We believe Google intentionally isn&#8217;t yet explaining just what <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/whats-new-in-googles-next-generation-search-caffeine-answer-to-bing' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://cruitertalk.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/google_search_2.jpg" alt="" width="216" height="141" />No matter what Bing may come and ago, we still love google for it&#8217;s higher relevance and accuracy rather than fancy stuff Microsoft is putting into their <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?p=1016" target="_blank">pathetic-decision engine</a>. Yesterday, without explaining what&#8217;s new, Google opened the floodgates on what it&#8217;s describing as the next generation of its search engine, most likely to test its efficiency and performance using real-world traffic.
Testers have been invited to <a href="http://www2.sandbox.google.com/" target="_blank">sample the new engine</a> that Google calls &#8220;<a href="http://www2.sandbox.google.com/" target="_blank">Caffeine</a>,&#8221;.
We believe Google intentionally isn&#8217;t yet explaining just what <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/whats-new-in-googles-next-generation-search-caffeine-answer-to-bing' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taranfx.com/whats-new-in-googles-next-generation-search-caffeine-answer-to-bing/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yahoo! CEO Bartz &#8220;We Have Never Been a Search Company&#8221;. Wrong!</title>
		<link>http://www.taranfx.com/yahoo-ceo-bartz-we-have-never-been-a-search-company-wrong</link>
		<comments>http://www.taranfx.com/yahoo-ceo-bartz-we-have-never-been-a-search-company-wrong#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 16:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taranfx</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microhoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?p=1560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://pdalbury.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/microhoo_logo.png?w=410&amp;h=140" alt="" width="246" height="84" />The <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?p=1490" target="_blank">Microhoo deal</a> is finally out of the news and Yahoo has finally happily settled in the grave built by Microsoft.
In an interview with Carol Bartz, Yahoo’s CEO, and she uttered a quote that lead to industry-wide disagreement.
When we think about Yahoo, Google, what do we think first?
Ms. Bartz places Yahoo’s position in a rather different light. “We have never been a search company,” she said. “It is, ‘I am on Yahoo. I am going to do a search.’”
What? Am I wrong or &#8230;?
<a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?tag=yahoo" target="_blank">Yahoo</a>, according to Ms. Bartz, simply feeds search results for people who have grown curious while reading one of its news <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/yahoo-ceo-bartz-we-have-never-been-a-search-company-wrong' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://pdalbury.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/microhoo_logo.png?w=410&amp;h=140" alt="" width="246" height="84" />The <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?p=1490" target="_blank">Microhoo deal</a> is finally out of the news and Yahoo has finally happily settled in the grave built by Microsoft.
In an interview with Carol Bartz, Yahoo’s CEO, and she uttered a quote that lead to industry-wide disagreement.
When we think about Yahoo, Google, what do we think first?
Ms. Bartz places Yahoo’s position in a rather different light. “We have never been a search company,” she said. “It is, ‘I am on Yahoo. I am going to do a search.’”
What? Am I wrong or &#8230;?
<a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?tag=yahoo" target="_blank">Yahoo</a>, according to Ms. Bartz, simply feeds search results for people who have grown curious while reading one of its news <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/yahoo-ceo-bartz-we-have-never-been-a-search-company-wrong' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taranfx.com/yahoo-ceo-bartz-we-have-never-been-a-search-company-wrong/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Official &#8211; Microsoft and Yahoo Search and Advertising Deal Insights</title>
		<link>http://www.taranfx.com/official-microsoft-and-yahoo-search-advertising-deal-insights</link>
		<comments>http://www.taranfx.com/official-microsoft-and-yahoo-search-advertising-deal-insights#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taranfx</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microhoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steve ballmer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?p=1490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://images.techtree.com/ttimages/story/104916_matter.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="150" />The rumors had been living for Microsoft-Yahoo deal since a year now. Last year, Microsoft failed to impress the shareholders, and could not settle with a deal to buy Yahoo.
Since then, we have seen a bunch of news about Micro-hoo! deals. With no final news coming out, it was getting fishy. But today, the deal was finally announced: <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?tag=microsoft" target="_blank">Microsoft </a>and <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?tag=yahoo" target="_blank">Yahoo</a>! have finally Married under a Deal - strictly limited to internet search and advertising.
This move, as per the companies, is supposed to help both in their competition with Google. The deal covers a whole chunk of things, but the most important one is that <a <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/official-microsoft-and-yahoo-search-advertising-deal-insights' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://images.techtree.com/ttimages/story/104916_matter.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="150" />The rumors had been living for Microsoft-Yahoo deal since a year now. Last year, Microsoft failed to impress the shareholders, and could not settle with a deal to buy Yahoo.
Since then, we have seen a bunch of news about Micro-hoo! deals. With no final news coming out, it was getting fishy. But today, the deal was finally announced: <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?tag=microsoft" target="_blank">Microsoft </a>and <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?tag=yahoo" target="_blank">Yahoo</a>! have finally Married under a Deal - strictly limited to internet search and advertising.
This move, as per the companies, is supposed to help both in their competition with Google. The deal covers a whole chunk of things, but the most important one is that <a <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/official-microsoft-and-yahoo-search-advertising-deal-insights' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taranfx.com/official-microsoft-and-yahoo-search-advertising-deal-insights/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Sells Stake in AOL. Loss less than Expected &#8211; $400Million</title>
		<link>http://www.taranfx.com/google-sells-stake-in-aol-loss-less-than-expected-400million</link>
		<comments>http://www.taranfx.com/google-sells-stake-in-aol-loss-less-than-expected-400million#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 20:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taranfx</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?p=1484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://gadgetsonthego.net/pics/aol_google.gif" alt="" width="220" height="165" />About Four years back, in 2005, Google made an interesting investment: $1 billion dollars for 5% stake in AOL. The purpose – AOL provided Google with a ton of new advertising, search, and revenue opportunities via a strong partnership. Google, in return, got a 5-year deal to be <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/16/AR2005121601892.html" target="_blank">AOL’s default search engine</a>. Ain&#8217;t that kool?
But the value of that deal has only dropped like a rock in a lake since then. AOL has shown a downward trend. Condition has continued to deteriorate, despite highlights like the acquisitions of Bebo and Socialthing.  Thus, Google’s decided to minimize its&#8217; losses and has sold back its AOL stake for $283 million.
According to <a <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/google-sells-stake-in-aol-loss-less-than-expected-400million' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://gadgetsonthego.net/pics/aol_google.gif" alt="" width="220" height="165" />About Four years back, in 2005, Google made an interesting investment: $1 billion dollars for 5% stake in AOL. The purpose – AOL provided Google with a ton of new advertising, search, and revenue opportunities via a strong partnership. Google, in return, got a 5-year deal to be <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/16/AR2005121601892.html" target="_blank">AOL’s default search engine</a>. Ain&#8217;t that kool?
But the value of that deal has only dropped like a rock in a lake since then. AOL has shown a downward trend. Condition has continued to deteriorate, despite highlights like the acquisitions of Bebo and Socialthing.  Thus, Google’s decided to minimize its&#8217; losses and has sold back its AOL stake for $283 million.
According to <a <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/google-sells-stake-in-aol-loss-less-than-expected-400million' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taranfx.com/google-sells-stake-in-aol-loss-less-than-expected-400million/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Secretly Fears Google even after Bing</title>
		<link>http://www.taranfx.com/microsoft-secretly-fears-google-even-after-bing</link>
		<comments>http://www.taranfx.com/microsoft-secretly-fears-google-even-after-bing#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 21:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taranfx</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?p=1419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://images.google.co.in/url?source=imgres&amp;ct=img&amp;q=http://www.mahoningjvs.k12.oh.us/bpa/banks/Microsoft-il-da-in-judecata-pe-Google-2.jpg&amp;usg=AFQjCNEua-YHtfNVcqXIWZQn7Of-Qud37A" alt="" width="168" height="168" />Microsoft had high hopes on <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?tag=bing" target="_blank">Bing</a> and they have should good numbers, recently. As per the latest reports from ComScore, Bing is not catching up as well as Microsoft quoted it was.
As per Betanews post:
Today, the first broader-based data analysis from ratings service comScore closely confirms what the early samples were saying: During the month of June, Microsoft-hosted searches including Bing for US customers numbered just 30 million more than for Microsoft-hosted searches including Windows Live the month before. This is during a month when just over 14 billion <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/microsoft-secretly-fears-google-even-after-bing' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://images.google.co.in/url?source=imgres&amp;ct=img&amp;q=http://www.mahoningjvs.k12.oh.us/bpa/banks/Microsoft-il-da-in-judecata-pe-Google-2.jpg&amp;usg=AFQjCNEua-YHtfNVcqXIWZQn7Of-Qud37A" alt="" width="168" height="168" />Microsoft had high hopes on <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?tag=bing" target="_blank">Bing</a> and they have should good numbers, recently. As per the latest reports from ComScore, Bing is not catching up as well as Microsoft quoted it was.
As per Betanews post:
Today, the first broader-based data analysis from ratings service comScore closely confirms what the early samples were saying: During the month of June, Microsoft-hosted searches including Bing for US customers numbered just 30 million more than for Microsoft-hosted searches including Windows Live the month before. This is during a month when just over 14 billion <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/microsoft-secretly-fears-google-even-after-bing' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taranfx.com/microsoft-secretly-fears-google-even-after-bing/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bing ditches Google, now Ready for RealTime Twitter Search.</title>
		<link>http://www.taranfx.com/bing-ditches-google-now-ready-for-realtime-twitter-search</link>
		<comments>http://www.taranfx.com/bing-ditches-google-now-ready-for-realtime-twitter-search#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taranfx</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?p=1309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" style="margin:5px;" src="http://devcentral.f5.com/weblogs/images/devcentral_f5_com/weblogs/Joe/WindowsLiveWriter/IntroducingAskBingThePowerShellBingTwitt_A31B/TwitterBing_2.jpg" alt="" width="230" height="152" />M<strong>icrosoft adds real-time search capabilities to its Bing search engine as it seeks to knock Google from its search perch. </strong>
Now users can use Bing to find the latest Twitter tweets. The Intial move comes as startups CrowdEye, <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?p=1178" target="_blank">Collecta </a>and others are propagating the Web with real-time search.
In a surprise move. Microsoft July st1 added the ability for users to search Twitter tweets with its Bing search engine, the company&#8217;s latest attack on Google&#8217;s search stronghold. Bing has has started integrating real time Twitter search results into its results. This is <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/bing-ditches-google-now-ready-for-realtime-twitter-search' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" style="margin:5px;" src="http://devcentral.f5.com/weblogs/images/devcentral_f5_com/weblogs/Joe/WindowsLiveWriter/IntroducingAskBingThePowerShellBingTwitt_A31B/TwitterBing_2.jpg" alt="" width="230" height="152" />M<strong>icrosoft adds real-time search capabilities to its Bing search engine as it seeks to knock Google from its search perch. </strong>
Now users can use Bing to find the latest Twitter tweets. The Intial move comes as startups CrowdEye, <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?p=1178" target="_blank">Collecta </a>and others are propagating the Web with real-time search.
In a surprise move. Microsoft July st1 added the ability for users to search Twitter tweets with its Bing search engine, the company&#8217;s latest attack on Google&#8217;s search stronghold. Bing has has started integrating real time Twitter search results into its results. This is <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/bing-ditches-google-now-ready-for-realtime-twitter-search' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taranfx.com/bing-ditches-google-now-ready-for-realtime-twitter-search/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google is too Slow! And Alternative is NOT Bing!</title>
		<link>http://www.taranfx.com/google-is-too-slow-and-alternative-is-not-bing</link>
		<comments>http://www.taranfx.com/google-is-too-slow-and-alternative-is-not-bing#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taranfx</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Collecta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[realtime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?p=1178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" style="margin:5px;" src="http://luckyrobot.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/collecta-logo.png" alt="" width="230" height="124" />Google caches the web information slowly. With the speed of the information coming into the web every millisecond, Google doesn&#8217;t do a good job in giving LIVE results. With News, Blogs and micro blogging like Twitter having thousands of new peices of information every second,  google can&#8217;t really speed up to this rate.
We need an alternative that can satisfy our LIVE news requirement. Google will still be our primary search engine but for live events we need something better. Were you thinking about Bing at this time? Don&#8217;t even dare to! Bing has no base, past or future, I&#8217;m talking about a 6month testing mature Realtime search engine &#8220;<a href="http://www.collecta.com" target="_blank">Collecta</a>&#8221; <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/google-is-too-slow-and-alternative-is-not-bing' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" style="margin:5px;" src="http://luckyrobot.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/collecta-logo.png" alt="" width="230" height="124" />Google caches the web information slowly. With the speed of the information coming into the web every millisecond, Google doesn&#8217;t do a good job in giving LIVE results. With News, Blogs and micro blogging like Twitter having thousands of new peices of information every second,  google can&#8217;t really speed up to this rate.
We need an alternative that can satisfy our LIVE news requirement. Google will still be our primary search engine but for live events we need something better. Were you thinking about Bing at this time? Don&#8217;t even dare to! Bing has no base, past or future, I&#8217;m talking about a 6month testing mature Realtime search engine &#8220;<a href="http://www.collecta.com" target="_blank">Collecta</a>&#8221; <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/google-is-too-slow-and-alternative-is-not-bing' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taranfx.com/google-is-too-slow-and-alternative-is-not-bing/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You hate Bing? Microsoft might be Watching you</title>
		<link>http://www.taranfx.com/you-hate-bing-microsoft-might-be-watching-you</link>
		<comments>http://www.taranfx.com/you-hate-bing-microsoft-might-be-watching-you#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 18:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taranfx</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sucks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?p=1126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3327/3582839977_2efcb15f27_o.jpg" alt="" width="258" height="187" />Microsoft is insanely serious on getting into search game. This is quiet justified due to phenomenal reasons. Being a search giant you get the royalty for everthing on the web. Take google for instance, they are the GOD of the Web. And, they sell the ads the way no one else can.
Previously, when I made post on &#8220;<a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?p=1016" target="_blank">Why Bing sucks</a>&#8220;, I was hit with large amount of traffic, which made me conclude that I wasn&#8217;t alone. I did some analytics to study the behavior of visitors that were keen in such blogs. They were somehow related with &#8220;Microsoft Hatred&#8221;. From there, I found something really interesting which made me blog this.
I observed a reckless pattern of visitors. Some <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/you-hate-bing-microsoft-might-be-watching-you' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3327/3582839977_2efcb15f27_o.jpg" alt="" width="258" height="187" />Microsoft is insanely serious on getting into search game. This is quiet justified due to phenomenal reasons. Being a search giant you get the royalty for everthing on the web. Take google for instance, they are the GOD of the Web. And, they sell the ads the way no one else can.
Previously, when I made post on &#8220;<a href="http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?p=1016" target="_blank">Why Bing sucks</a>&#8220;, I was hit with large amount of traffic, which made me conclude that I wasn&#8217;t alone. I did some analytics to study the behavior of visitors that were keen in such blogs. They were somehow related with &#8220;Microsoft Hatred&#8221;. From there, I found something really interesting which made me blog this.
I observed a reckless pattern of visitors. Some <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/you-hate-bing-microsoft-might-be-watching-you' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taranfx.com/you-hate-bing-microsoft-might-be-watching-you/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reports of Bing eating Yahoo share Appear to be Mistaken</title>
		<link>http://www.taranfx.com/reports-of-bing-eating-yahoo-share-appear-to-be-mistaken</link>
		<comments>http://www.taranfx.com/reports-of-bing-eating-yahoo-share-appear-to-be-mistaken#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 13:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taranfx</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?p=1064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>

<img class="alignleft" style="border-width: 0px; padding-bottom: 5px; cursor: pointer;" onclick="javascript:window.open('http://images.dailytech.com/nimage/11283_large_Bing_Screenshot.PNG');" onmouseover="this.style.cursor='pointer'" src="http://images.dailytech.com/nimage/11283_Bing_Screenshot.PNG" alt="" width="300" height="204" />
News of Bing eating Google and Yahoo search share rules out to be a miss-calculation. Three out of four major market research firms say that Yahoo still leads significantly in traffic. (Source: DailyTech)
 

Microsoft&#8217;s new product seized the number two search spot says one research report, others disagree 
The Yahoo Microsoft saga is an irresistible one for the tech news community, both for journalists and readers alike.  After Yahoo disregarded Microsoft&#8217;s 2008 purchase offer, Microsoft decided to go its own way, cooking up Kudo.  So <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/reports-of-bing-eating-yahoo-share-appear-to-be-mistaken' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>

<img class="alignleft" style="border-width: 0px; padding-bottom: 5px; cursor: pointer;" onclick="javascript:window.open('http://images.dailytech.com/nimage/11283_large_Bing_Screenshot.PNG');" onmouseover="this.style.cursor='pointer'" src="http://images.dailytech.com/nimage/11283_Bing_Screenshot.PNG" alt="" width="300" height="204" />
News of Bing eating Google and Yahoo search share rules out to be a miss-calculation. Three out of four major market research firms say that Yahoo still leads significantly in traffic. (Source: DailyTech)
 

Microsoft&#8217;s new product seized the number two search spot says one research report, others disagree 
The Yahoo Microsoft saga is an irresistible one for the tech news community, both for journalists and readers alike.  After Yahoo disregarded Microsoft&#8217;s 2008 purchase offer, Microsoft decided to go its own way, cooking up Kudo.  So <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/reports-of-bing-eating-yahoo-share-appear-to-be-mistaken' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taranfx.com/reports-of-bing-eating-yahoo-share-appear-to-be-mistaken/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Bing Sucks. Top 5 Reasons.</title>
		<link>http://www.taranfx.com/why-bing-sucks-top-5-reasons</link>
		<comments>http://www.taranfx.com/why-bing-sucks-top-5-reasons#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 10:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taranfx</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?p=1016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" title="bing sucks" src="http://news.sky.com/sky-news/content/StaticFile/jpg/2009/Jun/Week1/15293382.jpg" alt="featured" width="320" height="180" />For the past several days I’ve been using Microsoft’s  new Bing search engine in tandem with Google to compare the results without sacrificing my previous experience.  The main reason why I did this was because I’d like to see viable competition to Google in the search engine space — plus I just like to try new things. After using Bing for several days, I think I’ll probably be going back to Google. I’m still going to give Bing a couple more days but so far the Cons of using Bing outweigh the Pros.
As I see it, following are the positives and negatives of Bing.
<strong>UPDATE:</strong> Some basic searches on BING just don&#8217;t work
&#8220;Was Einstein married?&#8221;
&#8220;What did Benjamin Franklin <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/why-bing-sucks-top-5-reasons' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" title="bing sucks" src="http://news.sky.com/sky-news/content/StaticFile/jpg/2009/Jun/Week1/15293382.jpg" alt="featured" width="320" height="180" />For the past several days I’ve been using Microsoft’s  new Bing search engine in tandem with Google to compare the results without sacrificing my previous experience.  The main reason why I did this was because I’d like to see viable competition to Google in the search engine space — plus I just like to try new things. After using Bing for several days, I think I’ll probably be going back to Google. I’m still going to give Bing a couple more days but so far the Cons of using Bing outweigh the Pros.
As I see it, following are the positives and negatives of Bing.
<strong>UPDATE:</strong> Some basic searches on BING just don&#8217;t work
&#8220;Was Einstein married?&#8221;
&#8220;What did Benjamin Franklin <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/why-bing-sucks-top-5-reasons' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taranfx.com/why-bing-sucks-top-5-reasons/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>205</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bing Search: What it could do to Google!</title>
		<link>http://www.taranfx.com/bing-search-what-it-could-do-to-google</link>
		<comments>http://www.taranfx.com/bing-search-what-it-could-do-to-google#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 20:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taranfx</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smart search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wolfram]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?p=1003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://www.technologygear.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/search_engines.jpg" alt="" width="264" height="258" /><strong>What is Bing all about:</strong>
To assert its presence in the internet search space, Microsoft has come up with &#8216;Bing&#8217;- a new search service that promises to help customers make better decisions. The software giant&#8217;s latest foray into internet search arena comes after many attempts to challenge the dominance of Google.
Bing would go live on June 3, Microsoft said in a statement.
Terming it as a &#8216;<strong>Decision Engine</strong>&#8216;, the firm noted the new search service would help customers to make better decisions.
Bing would initially focus on four key areas: &#8220;making a purchase decision, planning a trip, researching a health condition or finding a local business&#8221;.
The software major is yet to make a <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/bing-search-what-it-could-do-to-google' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://www.technologygear.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/search_engines.jpg" alt="" width="264" height="258" /><strong>What is Bing all about:</strong>
To assert its presence in the internet search space, Microsoft has come up with &#8216;Bing&#8217;- a new search service that promises to help customers make better decisions. The software giant&#8217;s latest foray into internet search arena comes after many attempts to challenge the dominance of Google.
Bing would go live on June 3, Microsoft said in a statement.
Terming it as a &#8216;<strong>Decision Engine</strong>&#8216;, the firm noted the new search service would help customers to make better decisions.
Bing would initially focus on four key areas: &#8220;making a purchase decision, planning a trip, researching a health condition or finding a local business&#8221;.
The software major is yet to make a <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/bing-search-what-it-could-do-to-google' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taranfx.com/bing-search-what-it-could-do-to-google/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wolfram Alpha: Wikipedia killer?</title>
		<link>http://www.taranfx.com/wolfram-alpha-wikipedia-killer</link>
		<comments>http://www.taranfx.com/wolfram-alpha-wikipedia-killer#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 19:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taranfx</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wiki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikipedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wolfram]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?p=1001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://chattahbox.com/images/2009/05/wolfram_alpha_logo.jpg" alt="" width="250" height="250" />Despite being a devotee of all things Google, I’ve been incredibly excited about Wolfram Alpha. I’ve been using it quite a bit and have its quirks and limitations pretty much down. Those limitations mean that it won’t be a Google killer, but it will be especially useful to students and teachers. Given that, I was more excited about Microsoft’s “decision engine,” Bing, than I have been about a Microsoft product in a while. Could it combine the focused precision of Alpha with the richness of Google?
During a break tonight between working on scheduling and making some website updates (and trying to block out the tweeting of our baby chicks (a story unto itself; I’ll stick with Bing for now), I pulled up bing.com. Although it isn’t live yet, the site <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/wolfram-alpha-wikipedia-killer' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://chattahbox.com/images/2009/05/wolfram_alpha_logo.jpg" alt="" width="250" height="250" />Despite being a devotee of all things Google, I’ve been incredibly excited about Wolfram Alpha. I’ve been using it quite a bit and have its quirks and limitations pretty much down. Those limitations mean that it won’t be a Google killer, but it will be especially useful to students and teachers. Given that, I was more excited about Microsoft’s “decision engine,” Bing, than I have been about a Microsoft product in a while. Could it combine the focused precision of Alpha with the richness of Google?
During a break tonight between working on scheduling and making some website updates (and trying to block out the tweeting of our baby chicks (a story unto itself; I’ll stick with Bing for now), I pulled up bing.com. Although it isn’t live yet, the site <a href='http://www.taranfx.com/wolfram-alpha-wikipedia-killer' rel="nofollow"> Read further &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taranfx.com/wolfram-alpha-wikipedia-killer/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
